Recently in Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) Category

April 21, 2011

2010 Louisiana Railroad Worker Safety Report Released By Federal Railroad Administration

 
WORKER SAFETY REPORT - REPORTABLE CONDITIONS

Type of Job: Professional and Administrative
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Condition Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Cut/abrasion 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
All 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0




Type of Job: Maintenance of Way and Structures
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Condition Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bruise/contusion 2 2.7 61 2.1 31 1 2.3 85 17.1 43
Occ. Illness 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str., other 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,leg/foot 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 23 4.6 23
Sprain/Str.,torso 3 4.0 3 0.1 1 1 2.3 3 0.6 1
Cut/abrasion 3 4.0 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Puncture wound 4 5.3 54 1.8 14 2 4.5 23 4.6 6
Fracture,arm/hand 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Fracture,torso 1 1.3 23 0.8 23 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Dental related 1 1.3 2 0.1 2 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Unspecified injury 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
All 19 25.3 323 11.0 17 7 15.9 134 27.0 7




Type of Job: Maintenance of Equipment and Stores
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Condition Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bruise/contusion 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Crushing injury 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 48 9.7 48
Sprain/Str., other 1 1.3 14 0.5 14 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,arm/hand 1 1.3 2 0.1 2 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,torso 2 2.7 140 4.8 70 1 2.3 16 3.2 8
All 6 8.0 156 5.3 26 3 6.8 64 12.9 11




Type of Job: Transportation, Other Than Train and Engine
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Condition Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bruise/contusion 1 1.3 5 0.2 5 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Occ. Illness 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,leg/foot 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,torso 3 4.0 335 11.4 112 3 6.8 0 0.0 0
Fracture,arm/hand 1 1.3 6 0.2 6 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
All 7 9.3 526 18.0 75 6 13.6 0 0.0 0




Type of Job: Transportation, Train and Engine
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Condition Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bruise/contusion 6 8.0 64 2.2 11 4 9.1 73 14.7 12
Occ. Illness 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Sprain/Str.,arm/hand 4 5.3 182 6.2 46 3 6.8 7 1.4 2
Sprain/Str.,leg/foot 6 8.0 269 9.2 45 6 13.6 61 12.3 10
Sprain/Str.,head/face 4 5.3 117 4.0 29 3 6.8 57 11.5 14
Sprain/Str.,torso 12 16.0 768 26.2 64 7 15.9 2 0.4 0
Cut/abrasion 2 2.7 148 5.1 74 2 4.5 42 8.5 21
Fracture,arm/hand 1 1.3 155 5.3 155 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Fracture,leg/foot 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Rupture/tear, tendon, etc 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 56 11.3 56
Gunshot/knife wound 1 1.3 39 1.3 39 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Fatality 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Skin reaction 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Unspecified injury 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
All 42 56.0 1,922 65.7 46 28 63.6 298 60.1 7

 


WORKER SAFETY REPORT - EVENTS CAUSING

Type of Job: Professional and Administrative
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Event/occurrence Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Caught, crushed, pinched, other 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
All 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0




Type of Job: Maintenance of Way and Structures
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Event/occurrence Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bodily function/sudden movement, e.g.,sneezing,twi 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Caught in/compressed by powered hand tools 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Caught in/crushed by materials 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Caught, crushed, pinched, other 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Climatic condition, exposure to environmental heat 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Collision - between on track equipment 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Collision/impact - auto, truck, bus, van, etc. 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 85 17.1 85
Defective/malfunctioning equipment 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Other (describe in narrative) 1 1.3 3 0.1 3 1 2.3 3 0.6 3
Overexertion 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Slipped, fell, stumbled, etc. due to climatic cond 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 23 4.6 23
Slipped,fell,stumbled,etc. due to irregular surfac 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Struck by object 4 5.3 83 2.8 21 2 4.5 23 4.6 6
Struck by thrown or propelled object 2 2.7 25 0.9 13 2 4.5 0 0.0 0
Sudden/Unexpected Movement of tools 1 1.3 32 1.1 32 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
All 19 25.3 323 11.0 17 7 15.9 134 27.0 7




Type of Job: Maintenance of Equipment and Stores
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Event/occurrence Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Caught in/crushed by materials 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 48 9.7 48
Overexertion 2 2.7 0 0.0 0 - - 16 3.2 8
Pushed/shoved into/against 1 1.3 140 4.8 140 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Slipped, fell, stumbled, etc. due to climatic cond 1 1.3 14 0.5 14 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Slipped, fell, stumbled, other 1 1.3 2 0.1 2 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
All 6 8.0 156 5.3 26 3 6.8 64 12.9 11




Type of Job: Transportation, Other Than Train and Engine
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Event/occurrence Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Caught, crushed, pinched, other 1 1.3 6 0.2 6 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Exposure to noise over time 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Highway-rail collision/impact 3 4.0 335 11.4 112 3 6.8 0 0.0 0
Ran into on-track equipment 1 1.3 5 0.2 5 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Slipped, fell, stumbled, other 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
All 7 9.3 526 18.0 75 6 13.6 0 0.0 0




Type of Job: Transportation, Train and Engine
Selections: Railroad - ALL
State - LOUISIANA County - ALL
Worker on duty - employee/ALL CASUALTIES
Time Frame - Jan 2010 To Dec 2010
Event/occurrence Total Days Absent Absent Cases Days Restricted
Cnt % Cnt % Avg. Cnt % Cnt % Avg.
Bumped 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 10 2.0 10
Caught, crushed, pinched, other 2 2.7 156 5.3 78 2 4.5 0 0.0 0
Defective/malfunctioning equipment 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Derailment 4 5.3 257 8.8 64 3 6.8 56 11.3 14
Exposure to chemicals - external 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Exposure to noise over time 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Highway-rail collision/impact 9 12.0 109 3.7 12 5 11.4 122 24.6 14
Lost balance 2 2.7 138 4.7 69 2 4.5 0 0.0 0
Other impacts - on track equipment 2 2.7 29 1.0 15 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Overexertion 2 2.7 236 8.1 118 2 4.5 0 0.0 0
Ran into object/equipment 1 1.3 180 6.1 180 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Shot 2 2.7 39 1.3 20 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Slack action, draft, compressive buff/coupling 1 1.3 138 4.7 138 1 2.3 42 8.5 42
Slipped, fell, stumbled, other 4 5.3 360 12.3 90 2 4.5 0 0.0 0
Slipped,fell,stumbled,etc. due to irregular surfac 1 1.3 0 0.0 0 - - 0 0.0 0
Slipped,fell,stumbled,etc. due to object,ballast, 4 5.3 84 2.9 21 4 9.1 61 12.3 15
Slipped,fell,stumbled,etc. on oil, grease,etc. 2 2.7 5 0.2 3 1 2.3 0 0.0 0
Struck against object 2 2.7 11 0.4 6 2 4.5 7 1.4 4
All 42 56.0 1,922 65.7 46 28 63.6 298 60.1 7

Event codes replaced occurrence codes in 1997

For questions and information about Railroad Safety Problems Resulting in Injury, Contact Louisiana Railroad Injury Lawyer for additional questions. 

Source:

Safety Data FRA


October 15, 2010

Study Suggests Connection Between Noisy Workplaces and Cardiovascular Disease

Working in a noisy environment may be more than annoying-it may be bad for your heart. According to a study released this month by researchers at The University of British Columbia and published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, individuals working in noisy environments are at have a higher prevalence of chest pain, heart attacks, heart disease and high blood pressure due to psychological stress acquired by exposure to loud noise at the work place.

A team of researchers analyzed data on over 6, 300 employed individuals 20 years and older who participated in the U.S National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2004. As part of the U.S National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, participants underwent physical exams and answered questions about their occupational and general health. University of British Columbia researchers then divided the study participants by type of workplace: generally quiet work environments and persistently noisy workplaces. "Persistent noise" did not include loud music or talking but was defined as unwanted industrial noise such as the noise commonly found in mining and manufacturing industries. More than 20 percent of the approximately 6,300 individuals had been exposed to over 8 months of workplace noise. Even after taking into consideration the high rates of heart disease risks factors such as tobacco use and obesity among the mostly middle-aged male individuals working in a loud environment, researchers still found that workers exposed to industrial noise were about twice as likely to have serious heart problems than individuals working in quieter environments. According to study results, individuals exposed to loud noise at work were about twice as likely to have above normal diastolic blood pressure, a biomarker linked to hypertension and cardiac problems. Among those who worked in a noisy environment, men under age fifty and men who smoked were at a higher risk of coronary disease and heart attack.

Because the study relied on self-reported diagnosis data and did not consider other occupational factors associated with cardiovascular disease such as air pollution, further studies are needed before the connection between noise and cardiovascular illness is proven. Despite conclusive causal evidence of the connection, the scientific community is interested in the results of the study and eager to explore the possible connection further.

Source:

Study publication